9/7/2023 0 Comments Docker4drupalTokaido also ships with an incredible powerful CLI that helps eliminate the need for you to manually manage config files. Startup Time (excluding initial download) Docker-based solutions are the future, because they're very lightweight and easily ported between different platforms. Most developer workstations can only run one or maybe two VMs at a time before they run out of memory and CPU power.įor these reasons, we haven't listed VM-based solutions below because we don't think they're competitive enough. Ultimately, using a VM means using lots of memory and disk space just to get started. While virtual machine (VM) based solutions like DrupalVM and Beetbox are powerful tools, the fact that they use a VM puts them in a different class than Tokaido. If you don't have to learn Tokaido in order to use Tokaido, then we feel we've succeeded. So if good tools already exist in this space, why did we create Tokaido? The main reason and driving force behind Tokaido is a desire to build something that makes setting up Drupal environments truly effortless. A lot of work goes into making these incredible tools and if you use them, you might like to send a note to the developer(s) to commend them. We especially want to tip our hat to utilities like DrupalVM, Lando, and Docker4Drupal. There are many competing solutions in this space and a most of them are wonderful. Tokaido is of course far from the first local Drupal development environment manager. It is planned to be implemented in one of the future versions of the extensions (no exact ETA is available).If you're thinking about checking out Tokaido, we've prepared this section to help explain how Tokaido stacks up against some popular alternatives. So it will be possible to proxy requests from to the application's root in the container, the development team created a point for improvement for the Docker extension with ID PPM-2869. ) and create a proxy rule for the subdomain's root. For such purposes, they recommend creating a subdomain (e.g. I clarified this behavior with our development team, and they confirmed that currently, it is expected behavior. It is caused by the fact that in this case, the requests are proxied not to the application's root in the container, but to the same sub-URL as in the proxy rule (:39000/portainer in your case). However, when a subfolder is specified in the field URL in the proxy rule, the application in the container returns the error 404 (because not Plesk-branded 404 page is shown). Thus, everything works properly - the application works correctly on Example Domain. When the proxy rule is created for the domain's root the requests for the domain's root are proxied to the application's root in the container. I have this same configuration on a reverse proxy I run on a different server (non-plesk), and the config as I pasted it above works perfectly. If I remove the trailing slash in the config, I get in to the portainer container, but it has some kind of error (that doesn't happen when accessed directly via its port). Now, the strange thing here is that if I leave the location as "/portainer/", I get nginx's 404 (whether I open the url with or without the trailing slash). # Custom docker reverse proxy settings end # Custom docker reverse proxy settings begin I have this partially working using a custom nginx directive, but something is still not right and I don't know what.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |